(no title)

by Admin
Categories: Finance Resources
Comments: Comments Off

InterAksyon. com
The online news portal of TV5

MANILA, Philippines — Bottom Upwards Budgeting is the buzzword of the campaign associated with administration common bearer Manuel Roxas 2 and his operating mate, Leni Robredo.

So enamored is Roxas, a previous Interior assistant, with the J¨¹NGLING concept that he has upped the ante, promising to expand it directly into “BUB Pa More” along with P1 billion dollars set aside from your national spending budget — or roughly P1, 000 for every of the 100 million Filipinos — regarding services and facilities inside cities, towns, and into the barangay should this individual become the subsequent president.

But for the get away of Vice President Jejomar Binay, the presidential bet of the United Nationalist Alliance, J¨¹NGLING is only “legalized vote-buying” or, because his speaker Mon Ilagan spells it, “Bribe Ur Barangay” or perhaps “Buy 3rd there¡¯s r Barangay. ”

It is really worth noting, of course , that Binay himself have been bombarded having a barrage of corruption suggestions.

But Leonor Birones, lead convenor regarding budget watchdog Social Enjoy Philippines and a former Countrywide Treasurer, shares the same statement, noting that will “BUB money are (a) direct remittance from the nationwide government. inch

Thus, “if this (BUB) happens during an election year, you can not say that these are pure plus virgin money coming from countrywide government for the local government. inch

Briones, who else teaches in the University in the Philippines, mentioned the BUB’s objective may even “exacerbate nationwide control over local government during elections” instead of dislodging it up in the direction of decentralization.

In case Roxas wins, will the P100 billion allocation for J¨¹NGLING Pa A lot more be feasible? With cash pouring in, can nearby governments plus civil society groups deal with the program’s implementation?

Does it have the promised impact on areas in terms of providers and facilities form the authorities? How can this be protected from governmental policies? And does WICHT promote decentralization or fasten fiscal centralization?

The BUB process? /p>

As an option to traditional top-down budgeting, typically the Aquino supervision introduced the BUB this year in time for your preparation of the 2013 National Expenditure System.

Budget Admin Florencio Seratus tahun called it a device for “transparency and participation” as it allows people to immediately participate in organizing, budgeting in addition to monitoring implementation.

The process offers civil modern society organizations equivalent footing along with local government models identifying in addition to planning tasks needed by communities.

Typically the National No- Poverty Commission rate was tapped to put in place an empowerment program regarding CSOs and allow them to engage with LGUs.

The procedure calls for municipal local government devices to prepare an area Poverty Lowering Action Plan plus, based on the menu, identify the most urgent anti-poverty concern projects to be funded with the national authorities.

The Division of Inside and Local Federal government was made charge agency for your program, because it is in charge of local government units, to national government agencies tapped to be able to implement the particular identified jobs.

Increasing share? /p>

The WICHT is essentially an extra source of money for LGUs, which are provided P700 occasions the number of inhabitants, tallied using the small lower income area estimations based on the Family Income plus Expenditure Study and Census data.

Therefore, towns plus cities with additional poor occupants receive greater BUB aides.

However , typically the grant might not be less than P15 million nor more than P50 million for each LGU. The BUB likewise requires LGUs to provide a cash counterpart.

Regarding 2013, the government identified 609 poor cities to be covered by the program, which was allotted price range of P13 billion. There have been 10, 600 projects implemented in that 12 months.

For 2014, as the number of covered cities increased to at least one, 233 towns and metropolitan areas, the budget allowance doubled to P26. two billion regarding 23, 846 projects.

For 2015, the particular BUB price range was P21 billion addressing 14, 638 projects in most towns in addition to cities across the country.

For 2016, 14, 325 local low income reduction projects have been allocated P24. several billion.

Seratus tahun said WICHT will be expanded in 2017 to cover just about all 42, 036 barangay countrywide.

BUB Pa More? /p>

Here is how Roxas pitches the J¨¹NGLING.

“Ang bilang ng Pilipino ngayon, 100 million mhh tao. Nakita ko, pinag-aralan ko, kinalkula ko, hinanap ko ang pera sa budget, in nakita ko na, nasagot ko em itong lahat (There have become 100 mil Filipinos. I could see and analyzed it, calculating and looking for money in the price range, and I have found the answer to it all. ). One hundred , 000, 000 people occasions P1, 000 is P100 billion. Yang halagang yan, kukunin natin sa spending budget yang P100 billion na yan, at ipapamahagi natin yan social fear BUB procedure sa lahat ng bayan sa ating bansa (That amount, typically the P100 billion dollars, will be extracted from the budget and we’ll distribute of which through the J¨¹NGLING process to any or all municipalities within the country), inch he said.

Roxas’ brand new formula not merely increases the grant per homeowner from P700 to P1, 000, nevertheless makes the plan available to almost all, not just typically the poorest.

NAPC lead convenor Joel Rocamora says it can even be expanded further. “Mar is saying P100 billion.  But if you inquire Butch (Abad), he said government may fund J¨¹NGLING even around P200 billion. ”

“What the Aquino administration really wants is to push as much strength, activity plus money right down to the home town, and the BUB is a device for doing that, ” Rocamore mentioned.

Before the J¨¹NGLING, he said, people experienced no point out about what tasks were delivered to their communities. “Now, it’s the people who select which tasks will advantage them. We have been empowering the neighborhood government due to giving them the amount of money over which they could decide how to make use of that money, ” he or she said.

“It’s not just funds of national government going down to the local government units; it’s really the local federal government units attaining greater control of the money associated with national government agencies, ” Rocamora stressed.

Decentralization or centralization?? /p>

However , Briones noted conflicting policies involving the BUB as well as the Aquino administration’s other cornerstone anti-poverty program, the Conditional Cash Exchange.

“One major concept, which can be clearly enshrined in the Local Authorities Code and the Metabolic rate is that regional governments must be decentralized in addition to fiscally independent, ” the girl said. “Now you have this specific policy regarding BUB, where the national federal government directly gives the municipalities money.  While we all intone money autonomy, whatever we are really performing it fiscal centralization. ”

The lady noted of which in the US in addition to Canada, which often also offer grants to their poor, this is certainly done by way of a calibrated mechanism.

For example , the girl said, Europe gives scholarships to local peoples for them to catch up, but will not provide grants to Montreal as well as other large cities.

“What is usually disturbing is the fact BUB is currently for everybody when its supposed to be for the poor municipalities, inches she stated.

“This implies that one, there exists a lack of believe in for the local government system, which can be supposed to increase its own money; and secondly, if this happens throughout election time, then you are really tightening control of local government authorities because you help to make promises with them about certain funds in addition to projects, inches she described.

Even in the United Nations, Briones said there is growing concern about the condition of the Three Ds in every nation — Democracy, Decentralization, Growth.

The Philippines, she observed, is still a long way from attaining decentralization.

“We have it by law, but by fiscal selections, what we possess is fiscal centralization since money will be controlled by the national government, ” she stated.

For instance, in the P3-trillion plan for 2016, exactly what local government devices will receive straight is only P428. 6 billion or around 16 percent, along with other funds having to be discussed with the Section of Price range and Supervision and the chief executive.

“You can not be having decentralization and fiscal centralization at the same time. And if you are getting fiscal centralization, you cannot become having democracy. And if a person dont have democracy, then you cannot have advancement, ” Briones said.

J¨¹NGLING = Roxas?? /p>

While the BUB is being touted as an anti-poverty program, Briones said it cannot be rejected that it was set up in anticipation of this specific year’s polls.? When the BUB budget doubled from 2013 to 2014, it was put directly under the DILG, after that headed simply by Roxas.

“You have somebody who is DILG secretary as well as, presidential aspirant.? How can you individual that? inch she said. “Who will explain that BUB is not Mar’s and who will not admit Mar is a presidential applicant? ”

The particular administration may possibly say Roxas was applying the J¨¹NGLING as DILG secretary and that the funds used were genuine because they have been in the budget.

But Briones said this is what the International Monetary Account, in a paper, found difficult.

“The IMF findings is that all these finances are legitimate because they are covered by law, nonetheless it doesn’t reject the fact that it really is political because you have the DILG secretary, who himself will be the president in the Liberal Celebration, ” the lady said.

Rocamora said the particular BUB’s impact on the administration candidates was never a consideration during the program’s inception. “Policies and plans evolve, they are developed, however impact to be able to elections had not been among the concerns, ” this individual said.

He also declared that the understanding of a decentralized government was your ultimate objective, but this could only be attained together with small methods like the J¨¹NGLING.

“The other thing of which critics don’t understand is a lot in the money (allocated for BUB) is really the money of national government agencies, inches he stated. “So, it’s not just money of nationwide government going down to the local government units, it is the local government authorities gaining better control of the money of national government agencies, and madugong laban ito kasi sanay iyong mga ahensya na nagsasabi kung recto ang gagawin (it is really a bloody fight because these firms are used to saying what needs to be done). Given that is removed from their palms, ” Rocamora said.

Standing of jobs? /p>

In the angling village associated with Sta. Alb¨²mina in Batangas City, about a dozen fresh motorized banca were lined along the coast.

Reynaldo Bartolome pointed to 1 of the boats, which he said he or she received through the BUB job.

“We attended several conferences and we informed the mayor that we need banca.? Right now, we have them, ” he said.

Bartolome said typically the boats are not only used for angling but for patrolling the oceans against unauthorized fishing.


Comments closed

Today is Monday